DDD Music Forum: Forum Index
 FAQFAQ    MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Peak Oil & the Future of Energy
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DDD Music Forum: Forum Index -> Politics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MrGuitar



Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 3564
Location: not all who wander are lost

PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:24 am    Post subject: Peak Oil & the Future of Energy Reply with quote

Possibly the most important challenge the current generation of human beings faces in regards to the future of our species on earth. Oil production, in our lifetimes, is going to reach a peak at which the demand exceeds the rate of extraction and global oil supplies are in decline. There has thus far been no intellectual or actual realization of this coming phenomenon amongst the American public, despite it's extremely scary implications. On top of that, the problems of climate chaos, deforestation and unsustainable extraction of other resources, degradation of agricultural land/soils, increased pollution of our waterways and air, exponential population growth, and of course world governments unconcerned about peoples' interests is pointing us in the direction of a very dim future.

The Hirsch report has officially stated that global peak oil is unquestionably going to occur, and most likely will be abrupt and create serious adverse effects on global economies. The UN estimates 50 million climate change refugees by the year 2010. Food insecurity is growing each year with increasing crop failures, super-pests resistant to chemicals, rising food prices, and desertification of once productive lands. We are perpetuating a state of "biodevestation," what scientists refer to as 6X, or the sixth major extinction of lifeforms on earth in it's history. And of course, the consequences of an economic model based on infinite linear growth are catching up to us.

I don't think people realize the full power of how the culmination of all these crises is going to end up changing the world. There are a number of different scenarios possible, but unless a localized grassroots movement for sustainability and self-sufficiency is enacted, by us, the people, we are fucked. There is a lot that could be said about this subject, so I will stop this post here and continue in another post below for anyone who cares to read.

So anyhow, what is your opinion on the future of energy and the peaking in production of oil (and other fossil fuels we are dependent on, like natural gas)? What do you see as possible scenarios for the future? What to do about it? What are we doing about it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
joe.momma



Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 231
Location: I am not a number, I am a free man!

PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:12 pm    Post subject: Re: Peak Oil & the Future of Energy Reply with quote

As much of a tool Al Gore is, you gotta hand it to him for at least attempting to get this through to the generally retarded American public. Unfortunately, he chose to concentrate on the lesser of the two related evils, and that is partly why, I fear, the general public has ignored this so long.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Anpass



Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 5217
Location: il est pleut toujours quand on est triste.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UPDATE 1-Iran wants OPEC "solution" to low oil prices-IRNA wrote:
Crude prices have plunged by more than $100 a barrel since a peak of $147 last July as demand has tumbled. To shore up prices, OPEC pledged to cut output by a total of 4.2 million barrels per day (bpd) since September. "OPEC members on March 15, 2009 in Vienna will review the situation of the market and will present a new solution to improve oil prices," Nozari said. ... A Reuters survey on Monday estimated OPEC compliance at 81 percent and supply from the group in February remained 780,000 barrels per day higher than the implied target of 24.84 million bpd.

The good news: BP Replaced 121% of Reserves Last Year as Oil, Gas Output Rose
The bad news: Oil output could fall by 30m bpd by 2015

MrGuitar wrote:
There has thus far been no intellectual or actual realization of this coming phenomenon amongst the American public, despite it's extremely scary implications.

I don't think people realize the full power of how the culmination of all these crises is going to end up changing the world.
Actually, I think the American public and the US government understand quite well the implications of zero oil. Most US politicians in power today lived through the oil shortages of the 70s. To them especially, it remains very real. An severe oil shortage is something the 30 and under crowd have not lived through. Going to war in the middle east is a telling sign, as regards oil security, as to how vital energy supply is. Russia's stranglehold on gas supplies in Europe has most heads of state deeply worried. Rice supplies in Asia is always a very hot topic. And while Americans may be somewhat aloof about food shortages, the vast majority of the world isn't so aloof. We still get orderly runs on rice during supply scares even in the fairly stable economy of Singapore. Rice consumption outpaced production in 2008, tripling the cost of rice earlier last year.

Here's what I think you should be more worried about:
UPDATE 1-Resistance to flu drug widespread in U.S. - study. Besides HIV in asia and africa, disease and epidemics are more worrying to me, in terms of immediate and pressing problems. In terms of public awareness, I think far fewer people are aware of the ever present danger of a major outbreak of something deadly and uncontrollable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MrGuitar



Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 3564
Location: not all who wander are lost

PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i think it's all connected. if people really understand the implications of peak oil, then i don't see how consumption and waste keep on climbing as if there's no end in sight. the peak in u.s. production in the 1970s brought a couple of years of decline in consumption because prices ran too high, and then it just started growing again when we figured a way to steal oil from other countries. people in the u.s. pay about 1/4 of what europeans and most of the rest of the world pay for petrol and they expect it to be that way. oil literally fuels the lives of the majority of americans. communities and cities are designed for cars, not people. food production and distribution is completely dependent on abundant, cheap oil. energy in homes, for heating/cooling, cooking, electricity, even flushing the damn toilet is dependent on cheap and abundant fossil fuels. people do not know how to live without fossil fuel.

as far as food shortages go, it is not a matter of who is presently unable to provide all their food needs, it's a matter of the agricultural system in practice. it is another system which is completely dependent upon unlimited cheap fossil fuels: for equipment, fertilizers, pesticides/herbicides/fungicides, transport, processing, and distribution. it is a system which is continually in decline. anywhere it is practiced, it will without question fail. the rest of the world i'm sure is more aware of food scarcity but there seems to be little effort to alleviate this problem in a way that makes sense.

in my travels i saw patterns of behavior which eerily mimic the behavior of americans during the late 1940's, which is one of increased movement away from rural areas into cities and increased reliance on an unsustainable method of raising food. the fact that companies like monsanto come into these countries and present these great package deals to poor struggling farmers, acting as if they have all the answers to their problems of insecurity, makes things all the worse.

personally, i think disease and epidemic is completely related to all these issues. we are unhealthy because our soil and food is poisoned, our air and water is poisoned, our medical care is insufficient, our bugs and diseases are growing stronger because we are breeding them to do so, our diets are idiotic, our lifestyles are sedentary, our ignorance is bliss. no one issue can be singled out as the great cause of the problems we are facing today. we have forgotten the practice of not shitting where we sleep long ago. so because these problems are all related to one another, they must be addressed with a holistic solution which meets all the challenges posed. localized, self-sufficient economies which provide all of their own needs and comforts in a sustainable or regenerative way. the principle of redundancy suggests all needs be met in a diversity of ways.

permaculture
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orion
2009 Poster of the Year


Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 13426
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, seriously. Petrol reached $2.10NZ per litre, and that was just the basic stuff. Premium was $2.25NZ or something.

Edit: Last year when just before the big ecomonomic crisis.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Anpass



Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 5217
Location: il est pleut toujours quand on est triste.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MrGuitar wrote:
i think it's all connected.
No. All the oil or renewable energy in the world isn't going to save people from food shortages, or clean water shortages for that matter. Nor will all the right food save us from a plague. They impact each other, sure, but they are not connected.
MrGuitar wrote:
permaculture
A system of perennial agriculture emphasizing the use of renewable natural resources and the enrichment of local ecosystems is going to save me from a plague? That doesn't precisely explain why bird flu keeps coming out of Cambodia, which is still very much a permaculture in large part.

You could argue that segregating us from our agriculture production areas is actually more healthy, then less. Rural deaths from rice paddy breed dengue mosquitoes is no small joke. And while I joked about the neighborhood chickens in another thread, I am only half joking. Locally reared poultry is of big concern in China and southeast Asia. When i first moved to Asia, live poultry was prevalent in many yards and marketplaces, now it is all but gone in more developed parts of asia like hong kong and singapore. Civets are also a worry.

It is not that I don't applaud your ideas and commitment, it is just that I wish you would ponder some of the flip-sides of your ideology.

***
Orion, I can never tell when you are being serious, or taking the piss. ... ... ?


Last edited by Anpass on Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:35 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orion
2009 Poster of the Year


Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 13426
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

100% serious. Twas expensive. Then it dropped late last year. Was really, really strange.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
corrections
Moderator


Joined: 19 Apr 2005
Posts: 23136

PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anpass wrote:
MrGuitar wrote:
i think it's all connected.
No. All the oil or renewable energy in the world isn't going to save people from food shortages, or clean water shortages for that matter. Nor will all the right food save us from a plague. They impact each other, sure, but they are not connected.
MrGuitar wrote:
permaculture
A system of perennial agriculture emphasizing the use of renewable natural resources and the enrichment of local ecosystems is going to save me from a plague? That doesn't precisely explain why bird flu keeps coming out of Cambodia, which is still very much a permaculture in large part.

You could argue that segregating us from our agriculture production areas is actually more healthy, then less. Rural deaths from rice paddy breed dengue mosquitoes is no small joke. And while I joked about the neighborhood chickens in another thread, I am only half joking. Locally reared poultry is of big concern in China and southeast Asia. When i first moved to Asia, live poultry was prevalent in many yards and marketplaces, now it is all but gone in more developed parts of asia like hong kong and singapore. Civets are also a worry.

It is not that I don't applaud your ideas and commitment, it is just that I wish you would ponder some of the flip-sides of your ideology.

***
Orion, I can never tell when you are being serious, or taking the piss. ... ... ?


Additionally I think Peak Oil as a concept is a load of bullshit if we are talking about the idea of a sudden shock. The only way that sudden shock could possibly happen outside of an external shock to the system is if Saudi Arabia has been lying a whole hell of a lot about remaining reserves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MrGuitar



Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 3564
Location: not all who wander are lost

PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anpass wrote:
MrGuitar wrote:
i think it's all connected.
No. All the oil or renewable energy in the world isn't going to save people from food shortages, or clean water shortages for that matter. Nor will all the right food save us from a plague. They impact each other, sure, but they are not connected.
Why do food shortages happen? Why are there clean water shortages? How do the conditions which breed massive outbreaks of disease come about? How is it not all connected? Explain more what you're saying.
Anpass wrote:
MrGuitar wrote:
permaculture
A system of perennial agriculture emphasizing the use of renewable natural resources and the enrichment of local ecosystems is going to save me from a plague? That doesn't precisely explain why bird flu keeps coming out of Cambodia, which is still very much a permaculture in large part.
Where'd you find that definition? Some dictionary website? C'mon now, that's not what permaculture is. Permaculture is a movement, an idea - it can't be defined in such boxed terms because it is constantly evolving. It is about approaching world problems with integrative, holistic solutions based in ethics.

Antibiotics won't save you from plague either. Actually, if current understanding tells us anything, they will at best make you resistant for a while until a new super-bird flu comes around. I don't know much about bird flu, but like an enormous number of human epidemics and diseases throughout history, i'm sure it's caused by our domestication of that particular species and overconcentration of their populations. In any case, a human epidemic is probably precisely what we need to get things in order.

Anpass wrote:
You could argue that segregating us from our agriculture production areas is actually more healthy, then less. Rural deaths from rice paddy breed dengue mosquitoes is no small joke. And while I joked about the neighborhood chickens in another thread, I am only half joking. Locally reared poultry is of big concern in China and southeast Asia. When i first moved to Asia, live poultry was prevalent in many yards and marketplaces, now it is all but gone in more developed parts of asia like hong kong and singapore. Civets are also a worry.
I would say that all has to do with the system of agriculture, not agriculture itself. If we grew our food in small scale systems of intensively managed, highly diverse perennial polycultures of multipurpose plants modeled on natural ecosystems, distributed it in small communities in which all inherent needs of each individual are met by others in the community, harvested our own water and filtered it using biological systems when necessary, generated our own energy, etc, the problem of plague would be nill. For one thing, the likelihood of outbreak in these conditions is minimized; for another, immune system strength is exponentially increased by diversity of diet and consumption of fresh and clean food; and last, even if there were an outbreak of disease in one particular place, it would be unlikely to become an epidemic because it would likely stay contained in the immediate community.

Anpass wrote:
It is not that I don't applaud your ideas and commitment, it is just that I wish you would ponder some of the flip-sides of your ideology.
Okay, that's fine but I just don't see what your showing me that I haven't considered. And I don't mean for that to sound pretentious.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MrGuitar



Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 3564
Location: not all who wander are lost

PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

corrections wrote:


Additionally I think Peak Oil as a concept is a load of bullshit if we are talking about the idea of a sudden shock. The only way that sudden shock could possibly happen outside of an external shock to the system is if Saudi Arabia has been lying a whole hell of a lot about remaining reserves.
yeah, kinda like when u.s. oil production peaked in the 1970s, and people were totally prepared for it, totally no shock at all, no problems or anything.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ochotres



Joined: 19 Apr 2005
Posts: 2713

PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've never understood this myself either, but who am I to say? If it really is as serious as you say though, it's a real shame that nobody cares about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
rockvirtuoso



Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 3373
Location: Scotty Anderson = God

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How can anyone not believe in Peak Oil? Every year since like 1975 or something we have used more oil than has been discovered, and also of importance is that many of the recent discoveries of decent size are under ocean shelves or in other tenebrous locations where the cost of production alone is between 50-70 USD a barrel (ie they arent even running the pump atm). When you throw in to the mix hedge fund and energy traders squeezing every last cent out of the market oil could easily be trading at over $200 a barrel in near future bull market times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A lot of my old friends from high school who are now Randian businessmen send me Peak Oil e-mails every fucking day. Their attitude is more along the lines of "We are all going to die and there's nothing we can do about it so we might as well do nothing but cocaine off hooker's legs all day" though.
Back to top
Pat Friend



Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 6397
Location: Philly

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mr g,

antibiotics are for bacterial infections (and are a last ditch effort -- for preventative bacterial remedies see: Probiotics), so they would do nothing against any kind of flu, bird, superbird, or other.

bacterial infections can be eradicated. viruses cannot be removed from the body, only put into remission. so --

anpass,

it is interconnected. if everybody ate like mr g, very few viruses would be active and commingling. if a select few didn't run energy industries like oil for their and their cronies' gain, small scale agriculture would take root again (as cheap production means are really the only justification for large scale agribusiness). more people would eat like mr g and fewer people would eat teh plastic'd garbage that lowers pH's and immune systems to begin with.

dr sebi cures aids?
http://www.assatashakur.org/forum/afrikan-wholistic-health/34308-who-dr-sebi.html

HIV, like any other virus, can be put into remission and it can be kept there. why do you think magic johnson's still alive? rich people don't die from AIDS. but medication is not the only route.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
monga18



Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 2903
Location: the sco

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dreww wrote:
A lot of my old friends from high school who are now Randian businessmen send me Peak Oil e-mails every fucking day. Their attitude is more along the lines of "We are all going to die and there's nothing we can do about it so we might as well do nothing but cocaine off hooker's legs all day" though.


well you can't blame them, ever since Lehman went under they've probably had a lot of free time to think about this shit
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
corrections
Moderator


Joined: 19 Apr 2005
Posts: 23136

PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MrGuitar wrote:
I would say that all has to do with the system of agriculture, not agriculture itself. If we grew our food in small scale systems of intensively managed, highly diverse perennial polycultures of multipurpose plants modeled on natural ecosystems, distributed it in small communities in which all inherent needs of each individual are met by others in the community, harvested our own water and filtered it using biological systems when necessary, generated our own energy, etc, the problem of plague would be nill. For one thing, the likelihood of outbreak in these conditions is minimized; for another, immune system strength is exponentially increased by diversity of diet and consumption of fresh and clean food; and last, even if there were an outbreak of disease in one particular place, it would be unlikely to become an epidemic because it would likely stay contained in the immediate community.

Anpass wrote:
It is not that I don't applaud your ideas and commitment, it is just that I wish you would ponder some of the flip-sides of your ideology.
Okay, that's fine but I just don't see what your showing me that I haven't considered. And I don't mean for that to sound pretentious.


Here is the biggest problem I have. You don't think epidemic diseases have been a problem throughout history regardless of the agricultural situation? They were in fact bigger problems in the past even with highly decentralized agriculture. See the bugs that kill humans adapt no matter what we do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DDD Music Forum: Forum Index -> Politics All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

DigitalDreamDoor.com



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Forums.nutsie.com is a music and movie list website whose owners have given its visitors
the privilege to discuss music and movies, and has no control and cannot in any way be held liable over
how, or by whom this board is used. If you read or see anything inappropriate that has been posted,
contact webmaster@digitaldreamdoor.com. Comments in the forum are reviewed before list updates.
Topics include rock music, metal, rap, hip-hop, blues, jazz, songs, albums, guitar, drums, musicians...